Human rights lawyer and activist Deji Adeyanju on Monday
testified before the Federal High Court in Abuja in the ongoing trial of former
Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, who is facing charges bordering on
alleged breach of national security.
Adeyanju appeared as the second prosecution witness before
Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, following a subpoena issued by the court.
The Department of State Security (DSS) had instituted the
case against El-Rufai over comments he made during a television interview, in
which he alleged that he intercepted a telephone conversation involving the
National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu.
According to El-Rufai, the alleged conversation contained
directives to security operatives to arrest him following his return from
Cairo, Egypt, on February 12.
During proceedings, prosecution counsel Oluwole Aladedoye,
SAN, tendered the subpoena issued to Adeyanju, which was admitted by the court
as Exhibit G without objection from the defence.
While giving evidence, Adeyanju told the court that reports
had circulated on February 12 suggesting that El-Rufai could either be arrested
or invited for questioning by security agencies.
He recalled appearing on an Arise Television programme on
February 13, shortly after El-Rufai had been interviewed on the same platform.
“I went to Arise, and El-Rufai was also on the show. My
segment came after his. During his interview, I listened to him speak on many
issues, and I countered many of the things he said because they were not true
or were half-truths,” Adeyanju told the court.
At the prosecution’s request, the court replayed the
television interview earlier admitted as evidence during the testimony of the
first prosecution witness.
Adeyanju confirmed that the recording accurately reflected
what transpired during the broadcast.
The prosecution also tendered a flash drive containing
Adeyanju’s interview alongside a certificate of compliance. Both were admitted
as Exhibits H and H1.
In the recorded interview played in court, Adeyanju
dismissed claims that security agencies intended to arrest El-Rufai at the
airport.
“If they wanted to arrest him, they would have done so at
the airport,” he said in the interview.
He further maintained that El-Rufai’s appearance on a
security watch list explained why operatives met him upon arrival.
“So once your name is there, the first thing is to
confiscate the passport,” he stated.
Adeyanju also argued that allegations of persecution against
the former governor should be viewed against actions taken during El-Rufai’s
tenure as governor.
“The oppressor of yesterday cannot suddenly become the hero
of today,” he said, while referencing the demolition of properties allegedly
belonging to political opponents during El-Rufai’s administration.
According to him, El-Rufai should be investigated for
alleged corruption before any prosecution is initiated.
During cross-examination, defence counsel Paul Erokoro, SAN,
questioned whether Adeyanju heard El-Rufai explicitly state that he tapped any
telephone conversation.
Responding, Adeyanju said, “El-Rufai said, ‘We listened to
their calls.’”
He added that if someone claimed a phone conversation had
been hacked, he would report such information because he lacked knowledge of
how the alleged hacking occurred.
Adeyanju further told the court that he only appeared to
testify because he was summoned and had no option but to comply.
Justice Abdulmalik subsequently adjourned the case until
June 23 for continuation of trial proceedings.
Click to signup for FREE news updates, latest information and hottest gists everyday
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com