Diezani Alison-Madueke, former minister of petroleum, has
gone before a federal high court in Abuja seeking to vacate an order granting
final forfeiture of her assets to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission
(EFCC).
Alison-Madueke, in an originating motion, sought an order
extending the time within which to seek leave to apply to the court for an
order to set aside the EFCC’s public notice issued to conduct a public sale on
her property.
The former minister is also seeking to stop the planned sale
of her assets by the anti-graft commission.
The EFCC had issued a notice that it planned to conduct a
public sale of all assets seized from Diezani beginning on January 9.
In the motion marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/21/2023, dated and filed
January 6, Diezani through her lawyer, Mike Ozekhome, argued that all the
orders of forfeiture obtained by the EFCC were made without jurisdiction of the
courts and “ought to be set aside ex debito justitiae”.
The former minister said she was not given fair hearing in
all the proceedings leading to the orders nor was she notified about the
proceedings or served with the court processes.
“The various court orders issued in favour of the respondent
and upon which the respondent issued the public notice to conduct a public sale
of items contained in the public notice, most of which court the interest of
the applicant, were issued in breach of the applicant’s right to fair hearing
as guaranteed by Section 36 (1) of the 1999 Constitution, as altered, and other
similar constitutional provisions,” she said.
“The several
applications upon which the courts made the final order of forfeiture against
the applicant were obtained upon gross misstatements, misrepresentations,
non-disclosure, concealment and suppression of material facts and this
honourable court has the power to set aside same ex debito justitiae, as a void
order is as good as if it was never made at all.
“The orders were made without recourse to the constitutional
right to fair hearing and right to property accorded the applicant by the
constitution.
“The applicant was never served with the processes of court
in all the proceedings that led to the order of final forfeiture.”
However, in a counter affidavit, the EFCC through its
lawyer, Rufai Zaki, described Deizani’s claims as “untrue”.
Zaki, who was a member of the team that investigated the
case of alleged criminal conspiracy, official corruption and money laundering
against the ex-minister and some other individuals, said investigations showed
that Alison-Madueke was involved in some acts of criminality.
“We hereby rely on the charge FHC/ABJ/CR/208/2018 dated 14th
November 2018, filed before this honourable court and also attached as Exhibit
C in the applicant’s affidavit,” he said.
He said contrary to her deposition, most of the cases which
led to the final forfeiture of the contested property “were action in rem, same
were heard at various times and determined by this honourable court”.
He said the courts differently ordered the commission to do
a newspaper publication inviting parties to show cause why the said property
should not be forfeited to the federal government before final orders were
made.
Zaki argued that one Nnamdi Awa-Kalu represented the
ex-minister in one of the forfeiture applications.
The EFCC investigator added that the order of forfeiture
Diezani is challenging was granted in 2017 and that she never thought to appeal
it.
The matter has been adjourned till May 8 for hearing.
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com