BREAKING NEWS
Breaking

728x90

.

468x60

Appeal court orders fresh hearing of el-Rufai’s suit against Kaduna assembly’s probe


 The Court of Appeal has nullified the judgment of the Federal High Court in the case instituted by Nasir el-Rufai, former governor of Kaduna, against the state House of Assembly.

 

In a ruling on the appeal marked CA/K/240/2024, the appellate court held that proceedings at the lower court were invalid due to a breach of El-Rufai’s right to a fair hearing.

 

The court found that the federal high court sat on July 18, 2024, without evidence that the former governor was served with a hearing notice, thereby denying him the opportunity to participate in the proceedings.

 

It also held that el-Rufai was not given the chance to respond to the respondents’ counter-affidavit, describing the omission as a violation of due process.

 

 

Based on the findings, the appellate court set aside the judgment delivered by Rilwanu Aikawa, judge of the federal high court, on July 30, 2024, declaring it a nullity for lack of jurisdiction.

 

The court ordered that the case be returned to the federal high court for reassignment to another judge.

 

El-Rufai had approached the lower court to enforce his fundamental rights, alleging that the Kaduna House of Assembly denied him a fair hearing in the course of its investigation.

 

 

However, while the matter was adjourned, the trial court proceeded to hear the case in his absence on July 18 and granted an application by the respondents.

 

The court later declined jurisdiction on the basis that the claims extended beyond fundamental rights enforcement.

 

The case was subsequently transferred to the Kaduna state high court.

 

Dissatisfied, el-Rufai, through his counsel, A.U. Mustapha, a senior advocate of Nigeria (SAN), challenged the decision, arguing that he was not notified of the hearing and was denied the opportunity to present his case.

 

 

In its judgment, the court of appeal stressed that service of a hearing notice is central to the validity of court proceedings and must be established before a matter can be heard.

 

The court further held that under the fundamental rights (enforcement procedure) rules, el-Rufai was entitled to file additional processes after the respondents regularised their filings, adding that denying him that opportunity breached his constitutional rights.

 

BACKGROUND

In April 2024, the Kaduna assembly inaugurated a 13-member committee to examine the loans, grants, and project implementation in the state during el-Rufai’s tenure.

 

 

The lawmakers said most of the loans obtained and projects implemented did not follow “due process”.

 

They also called for the prosecution of some of the commissioners and officials who worked under el-Rufai.

 

 

Speaking after the submission of the report, Yusuf Liman, speaker of the Kaduna assembly, said the alleged diversion of public funds and money laundering should be referred to law enforcement agencies.

 

“That the governor of Kaduna state between 29th May 2015 to 29th May 2023, as the chief executive officer of the state, breached his oath of office contained in the 7th schedule to the Constitution of Nigeria as amended and failed to exercise due diligence in the administration of the state,” Liman had said.

 

 

“Plunging the state into unwanted, unjustified,House and fraudulent domestic and foreign debt over and above the total loans obtained by Kaduna State from 1965 to 1999, from 1965 to December 31st, 2014, and majority were obtained without due process.

 

“Reckless award of contracts without due process leading to several abandoned projects, despite payments with no record of utilisation, and denying the state of the needed resources for development.

 

 

“Diversion of funds and money laundering are contrary to extant laws and regulations and, accordingly, should be referred to the law enforcement agencies for immediate investigation and prosecution.”

 

​​In June 2024, el-Rufai sued the Kaduna House of Assembly over a claim that his administration diverted N423 billion when he was the governor of the state.

 

He asked the court to declare the report of the ad hoc committee set up by the House of Assembly unconstitutional, null, and void for violating his right to a fair hearing.

Click to signup for FREE news updates, latest information and hottest gists everyday


Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
« PREV
NEXT »

No comments

Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)

Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com