Human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, says the Nigerian constitution does not expressly confer power on the President to assume or temporarily displace executive or legislative institutions of a state.
Falana made this known on Tuesday in an interview on Arise Television.
He was reacting to the Supreme Court judgment, which
reaffirmed that the President holds the constitutional power to declare a state
of emergency in any state where circumstances threaten public safety or
governance.
He said: “Unlike the constitutions of India and Pakistan,
the Nigerian Constitution does not expressly confer power on the President to
assume or temporarily displace executive or legislative institutions of a
state.
“Well, I think in fairness to the Supreme Court, the justice
that delivered the leading judgment, did send out what is regarded as summary
judgment.
“Unfortunately, most commentators have not bothered to read
the judgment. Yes, there is no doubt that the court did say or did confirm the
power of the President to adopt extraordinary measures to restore law and order
in any state where a state of emergency has been declared.
“There was no doubt before now that the President could
deploy forces or take other steps to restore law and order.
“What has always been controversy is the extent of the
powers, and the Supreme Court made the point that the provision of the
Constitution, section 305, has not set out the extent of the powers that the
president can exercise.”
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com