In 2016, Abubakar Malami, former attorney-general of the federation (AGF), hired the services of two Nigerian lawyers — Oladipo Okpeseyi and Temitope Isaac Adebayo — for the repatriation of $321 million stolen by Sani Abacha, the former military head of state.
Malami engaged the two lawyers barely one year after he
assumed office to act on his behalf in a suspicious move as the country
incurred additional four percent of repatriated funds from commission and
professional fees.
The repatriation of the stolen funds started before the
administration of former President Muhammadu Buhari in 2015.
The money had been recovered and frozen in 2013 under former
President Goodluck Jonathan but the repatriation process was stalled in 2015
following a lawsuit filed by the Abachas.
From 2013 to 2014, the federal government had engaged the
services of Swiss lawyers, Enrico Monfrini and Christian Luscher, to recover
the stolen funds from Liechtenstein and Luxembourg — and domiciled the monies
with the attorney-general of Switzerland.
Nigeria had paid four percent of the recovered Luxemburg
assets as professional fees and expenses to the foreign lawyers, in addition to
roughly $6.8 million in fees paid to Monfrini for the Liechtenstein recoveries.
Since all the fees had been paid by Nigeria, it was expected
that Malami, who was the then AGF, would sign a memorandum of understanding
(MoU) with the Swiss authorities and commit to an undertaking that the funds
would be properly utilised.
However, in December 2017, it was reported that Malami, in
what appeared to be a suspicious move, engaged the services of the two Nigerian
lawyers, which cost the country $16.9 million as commission and professional
fees from the recovered funds.
Recall that Malami engaged the two lawyers to
duplicate the job of the Swiss lawyers and get their own cut from the already
done deal.
Okpeseyi and Adebayo were lawyers to the Congress for
Progressive Change (CPC) — the legacy party of Buhari — that merged to form the
current All Progressives Congress (APC). Malami was legal adviser to CPC.
A senior official of the ministry of justice disclosed that “this is a case of re-looting Abacha loot”.
“A simple letter from the office of our attorney-general of
the federation to the Swiss attorney-general requesting the repatriation of the
funds to Nigeria consequent upon the signing of an MoU was all that was
required to consummate the deal,” the official had said.
Following TheCable’s report on the suspicious engagement of
the two lawyers, an article apparently sponsored to discredit the platform
alleged that Monfrini was asking for an additional 20 percent to “complete the
job”.
Malami allegedly made a counter offer of five percent which
Monfrini rejected, and this reportedly prompted Malami to engage the services
of two Nigerian lawyers.
However, Monfrini, in an email sent to TheCable in April 2018, denied the allegation, while describing it as a “lie”.
“I never had the audacity to claim for additional fees. This
figure of 20% is simply invented. I didn’t reject any proposal made by Mr
Malami since my fees were already paid a long time before Mr Malami’s
appointment as attorney general,” the lawyer said.
Monfrini also disclosed in series of interviews with TheCable that hiring the new lawyers was needless because he had already completed the task.
Recently, Malami reiterated the allegation that Monfrini
reportedly demanded additional 40 percent of the recovered loot, which was
renegotiated to 20 percent.
In December 2017, Nigeria and Switzerland sealed an MoU for the return of $321 million traced to Abacha.
THE FOI SAGA
In December 2017, TheCable Newspaper Journalism Foundation
(CNJF), a not-for-profit organisation that uses the vehicle of journalism to
advance transparency and accountability in government, sent a freedom of
information (FOI) request to Malami.
In the FoI request, CJNF asked the AGF to provide details of
payment to lawyers who worked on the repatriated $321 million fund stolen by
Abacha.
The foundation also requested details of the role Monfrini,
hired by the federal government since 2000 for the recovery job, had played in
this particular transaction for which he was already paid in 2014.
Malami refused to honour the foundation’s request.
On January 10, 2018, the foundation sued Malami over his
failure to respond to a FoI request on the engagement of lawyers for the
recovery of stolen funds.
The case, with suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/27/2018, was filed by
Kusamotu & Kusamotu law chambers at a federal high court in Abuja.
The foundation’s lawyer sought an order of mandamus
compelling the AGF to make available to CNJF the information and documents
requested from its office pursuant to the FoI act, 2011.
In September 2019, that court dismissed the foundation’s
suit citing non-submission of the certified true copies of the foundation’s
registration documents.
Inyang Ekwo, the presiding judge, had ruled that CNJF had
provided a photocopy of its certificate of incorporation “in contravention of
the rules of evidence which stipulate that such evidence ought to be a
certified true copy and not a mere photocopy. Therefore, the court found that
the photocopy tendered in evidence was inadmissible”.
Ekwo had argued that the portion of the affidavit in support
of CNJF’s application wherein it stated what its objectives are according to
its constitution is not proved by simply stating it in the affidavit.
He added that a certified true copy of the said constitution
filed with the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) must be filed together with
the affidavit and tendered as evidence.
Without considering the merits of CNJF’s application, the
court ruled that the foundation has not been able to prove that it is a duly
incorporated organisation that is capable of bringing the action.
The AGF did not raise any of the issues mentioned by the
judge in his defence.
RECENT DEVELOPMENT
Last week, Malami honoured an invitation from the Economic
and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
In a post published across his social media accounts on
November 29, the former AGF said his engagement with the anti-graft agency “was
successful”, adding that he has been scheduled for “further engagement”.
Subsequently, Malami said EFCC asked him questions
pertaining to the recovery of Abacha loot and the engagement of lawyers.
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com