A federal high court in Abuja has ordered the arrest of Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB).
At its sitting on Thursday, Binta Nyako, justice of the court, issued an arrest warrant against Kanu, citing the continued absence of the IPOB leader in court.
The court also revoked the bail which it granted the IPOB leader in 2017, and directed the proceeding will still continue even in his absence.
The judge, Justice Binta Nyako, whose decision was anchored on the provisions of section 352(4) of the Administrative of Criminal Justice Act, 2015, said Kanu had failed to appear in court since April 25, 2017, without any reasonable explanation.
The lead prosecuting counsel, Mr. Magaji Labaran, applied for the court’s orders earlier in the Thursday’s proceedings.
Kanu’s lawyer, Mr. Ifeanyi Ejiofor, had opposed Labaran’s oral application asking to be given more time to explain why his client had not been in court by filing all necessary papers.
He insisted that Kanu’s disappearance was as a result of soldiers’ invasion of the IPOB leader’s home in Afara-Ukwu near Umuahia, Abia State, during military’s ‘Operation Python Dance II’ staged to quell agitation for a Republic of Biafra.
But the judge, noting that she had in a judgment on a civil suit filed by Kanu, held that there was no nexus between the said military invasion and the IPOB leader’s disappearance.
She overruled the objection, noting that the request for explanation of the defendant’s absence in court was belated.
The judge, who also noted that Kanu had violated the conditions and terms of the bail granted him, recalled that after the defendant was granted bail on April 17, 2017, the following proceedings of July 11, 2017 could not hold due the court’s vacation.
She also recalled that on October 17, 2017 Kanu also failed to appear in court with his lawyer saying that the defendant absence from court was caused by the invasion of his home in Abia State by soldiers.
The judge also noted that the three persons who had guaranteed his bail had applied to the court to withdraw their suretyship because they could not account for his whereabouts.
She noted that on March 28, 2018, Kanu’s trial was separated from that of his four other co-defendants in order to avoid delays of the other persons’ trial.
She added that on November 14, 2018, she ordered that the sureties should temporarily forfeit their N100m bail bonds or produce Kanu in court.
The judge added since the time Kanu’s trial was separated from that of others, there were four court sessions that held and were adjourned without Kanu attending any.
“Proceedings must end one way or the other, Justice Nyako said.
She added, “I have given the counsel for the defendant more than enough time to produce him in court.\
Therefore, by virtue of section of section 252(4) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015, the only option open to do is to order that the trial will continue in his absence. Also in the absence of any reasonable explanation for his absence, I hereby revoke his bail and order that a bench warrant be issued for his arrest.
She fixed June 18 for trial to commence with or without Kanu’s presence in court.
But she adjourned indefinitely, the suretyship proceedings of Kanu’s sureties, who had applied to withdraw their suretyship.
The judge made the order of indefinite adjournment after Mr. Chukwuma-Machukwu Ume (SAN), the lawyer representing one of the sureties, Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe, informed the court that his client had appealed against the November 14, 2018 ruling ordering the sureties to forfeit their bail bonds.
Since last year, Kanu has been seen making appearances online and was at a time said to be on a religious pilgrimage to Israel.
Kanu’s lawyer, Ejiofor, has vowed to appeal against the court’s ruling for his client’s arrest and his trial to proceed in his absence.
KINDLY DROP A COMMENT BELOW