The ASUU President, Prof. Biodun Ogunyemi, stated this in an interview with our correspondent, noting that the next meeting between the union leaders and the Minister of Education, Adamu Adamu, and other government officials had been scheduled for Tuesday.
Ogunyemi said lecturers were not concerned about “bread and butter but we are making sacrifices for the future of our children and of our children’s children.”
The Federal Government had on Friday directed vice-chancellors of public universities and inter-varsity centres to enforce the no-work-no-pay rule against the lecturers who are on strike.
The directive had been communicated to the universities VCs in a memo by the National Universities Commission.
In the memo, reportedly signed by the Director, Research, Information and Technology, Dr Ramon Yusuf, the government stated that payment of salaries from any other sources would be viewed as a violation of extant rules and government’s directive.
But the ASUU President, Ogunyemi, said on Sunday that the union was not intimidated by the directive, noting that their negotiations with the government usually followed such pattern of threats.
Ogunyemi said, “It is not a big issue really. We are not losing sleep over such a directive. This has been a recurring threat since the military era. We are making sacrifices for our children and for our children’s children. This struggle, for us, is not about bread and butter. If they want to sack us, we encourage them to go ahead and they will have the consequences.
“The meeting last week Thursday was not too significant, but for the first time, the government was able to tell us what it will put on the table. We have another meeting on Tuesday and we are looking forward to it.
“We saw the memo on no-work-no-pay as something that was bound to come. In fact, we would have been surprised if it didn’t come. The government has always been predictable in their handling of negotiations with us. But we are not deterred; we are fighting for quality education and for the interests of our children.”
The ASUU president said that it also got to his notice that the Federal Government had withdrawn the memo, even though the NUC had yet to confirm the withdrawal.
Meanwhile, human rights lawyer, Mr Femi Falana (SAN), on Sunday described as illegal the circular issued by the Federal Government threatening to enforce no-work-no-pay policy against the striking members of the Academic Staff Union of Universities.
Falana asked the government to withdraw the “illegal circular” which he said was in violation of various judgments of the Supreme Court.
He said the Federal Government was “not properly advised.”
“Otherwise, it would have realised that even under the defunct military junta the application of ‘no-work-no-pay’ rule, threat to eject lecturers living in official quarters, promulgation of a decree which made strike in schools a treasonable offence and the proscription of ASUU did not collapse any of the strikes called by ASUU,” the senior lawyer added.
Falana said going by the decision of the apex court in Olufeagba & Ors v Abdul-Raheem in 2010, the vice-chancellors lacked the power to seize the salaries of the striking university teachers as directed by the Federal Government.
He said, “The implication of the judgment is that a university lecturer whose employment enjoys statutory flavour cannot be disciplined or sanctioned without being afforded the right of fair hearing by the governing council.
“With respect to the current ASUU strike, no university governing council has accused any lecturer of misconduct to warrant the seizure of salaries and allowances.
Therefore, the Federal Government, acting through the National Universities Commission, lacks the vires to direct vice-chancellors to seize the salaries and allowances of striking lecturers.”
He added, “That is a decision which can only be taken by the Governing Council of each university after due process must have been observed. If the Federal Government disagrees with our position, it is at liberty to pray the National Industrial Court for an interpretation of the application of the ‘no-work-no-pay’ rule to lecturers for participating in the ASUU strike.”
He argued that “the latest strike embarked upon by ASUU has complied with the provisions of Section 31 (6) of the Trade Disputes (Amendment) Act, 2005.”
KINDLY DROP A COMMENT BELOW