A coalition of local and
international election observers, who monitored the July 14 governorship poll
in Ekiti State, on Tuesday faulted the poll in their reports, insisting that
the election that produced All Progressives Congress, APC’s Kayode Fayemi as
Governor-elect, falls short of global electoral standards as a result of lapses
in the way a section of the large deployment of security agents conducted
themselves, among other electoral-related challenges.
The accredited observers
comprised representatives from over 50 domestic organisations, human rights
groups and international election observing bodies, some of which are Centre
for Credible Leadership and Citizens Awareness, (Nigeria), Justice and Equity
Organisation, (Nigeria), International Republican Institute (South Africa), and
Patriotic Women Foundation, (Abuja) as well as other bodies from the European
Unions among others.
Addressing newsmen in Ado-Ekiti,
state capital, on Tuesday, the observers praised the Independent National
Electoral Commission (INEC) for proper conduct of the poll in line with global
and constitutional dictates and standards, however faulted the deployment of
30,000 policemen for the poll, claiming that such development and conduct of
some of the security operatives largely marred the electoral process.
They insisted that such
unwholesome practices of voting buying tagged ‘see and buy’ in local parlance,
where voters surreptitiously showed which party they voted to party agents who
went behind to ‘settle’ them, ballot box snatching, sporadic shootings and
driving away of some party agents as well as intimidation, oppression and
forceful influence of electorates’ free will, featured among anomalies that
characterized the poll.
The observers therefore held that
the July 14 poll cannot be recommended as a template for the forthcoming 2019
general elections as it falls short of global standards and spells doom for the
nation if the lapses noticed were not addressed and a reorientation exercise
across board put in place.
Addressing newsmen on behalf of
the domestic observers, Dr. Gabriel Nwambu, of the Centre for Credible
Leadership and Citizens Awareness, Abuja, said: ” Modern democracy guarantees
freedom of electorate to determine who to vote, anything against this is an usurp.
Polls also should comply with globally accepted standards hence observers’ job
is to access the level of compliance of electoral umpire to constitutional
regulations which serve as a way to give direction for future exercise.
“Reports of observers remain a
potential tool for election tribunals and other monitoring and relevant bodies
for post election activities. 51 reputable domestic observer groups were on
ground in all the 177 wards, 16 Local Government Areas and all the polling
units in the state to monitor the poll. Ekiti has a record of being a serial
politically volatile state in Nigeria and this became manifest before during
and after the poll.
“On July 14, domestic observers
witnessed large turnout of the electorate from 6:30 am, earlier than the
stipulated time of 8:am. The exercise witnessed a high level of unprecedented
electoral related challenges and such abuse will remain contentious until
justice prevails, especially in the areas of cash inducement, arrests of
political stalwarts by security agents and snatching of electoral materials by
political thugs among other abuses.”
The observer cited some units and
wards in Aramoko, Ekiti West Local Government Area, and Efon Alaaye, Erungbua
settlement, Efon Local Government Area in which there were large numbers of
accredited voters, saying that while many electorate, including pregnant women,
persons living with disabilities and aged people trooped out to vote, card
readers were slow, as voting buying and cash inducement held sway.
They said, “Finger biometric
capture was slow. Party stewards were indicating to voters where to thumb
print. Poll was delayed due to slow pace of machines.
“Party agents had huge cash and
were close to voting points. Security agents were indifferent to cash inducement
of voters. The whole process falls short of the compliance with international
best standards.”
Speaking in the same vein, one of
the International observers, Mrs. Virginia Marumoa-Gae, of the International
Republican Institute (IRIS), South Africa, noted that accreditation and voting
began simultaneously as early as 6 am on Saturday, July 14, with large numbers
of electorate who arrived earlier than the scheduled 8am. She however noted
that trouble began at 11am when “see and buy” started and this caused chaos
across all the wards and polling units.
Citing several anomalies that
featured in the poll, she said: “Voters showed their ballot papers to party
agents to collect money, thugs disrupted voting process by shooting, but the
police and other attaching security agents did well by establishing their
presence at the polling units as stipulated by the constitution. We also noted
that the INEC has improved on card readers this time.”er.
Also speaking, Mrs. Yemisi Ige of
the Patriotic Women Foundation, a human rights organisation based in Abuja,
noted that while INEC did its best within the framework of electoral
regulations, conspicuous lapses in security caused many of the anomalies that
greeted the poll.
She said: “The July 14 was full
of human rights violations, political party agents arrest, disruption of polls
leading to cancellation of polls results, adding that the deployment of 30, 000
policemen was unwarranted as it scared some voters away and is a clear case of
violation of humans rights which disenfranchised voters as those who voted were
either induced or forced to vote a certain party and made the poll to fall
short of global standards.”
Concluding his report, Nwambu
said: “The poll fell short of the threshold of international standards as it
was based on vote buying, it will be a disaster to recommend the poll for 2019,
but INEC did a good job by conducting the poll in line with best global
standards, but they are not the security the challenge what gave rise to the
shortcomings is due to security lapses. There should be a reorientation as this
development spells doom for Nigeria ahead of 2019.”
Can you tell me anything that's up to global standard in Nigeria, from health, education, electricity, road network, etc. Why would these people think that election would be any different? Whilst we should not continue to applaud our inefficiency as a nation, we are on a journey and someday we will get there in every facet of our lives not election alone.
ReplyDelete