Observers discredit Ekiti election, say large deployment of security operatives marred exercise


A coalition of local and international election observers, who monitored the July 14 governorship poll in Ekiti State, on Tuesday faulted the poll in their reports, insisting that the election that produced All Progressives Congress, APC’s Kayode Fayemi as Governor-elect, falls short of global electoral standards as a result of lapses in the way a section of the large deployment of security agents conducted themselves, among other electoral-related challenges.
 

The accredited observers comprised representatives from over 50 domestic organisations, human rights groups and international election observing bodies, some of which are Centre for Credible Leadership and Citizens Awareness, (Nigeria), Justice and Equity Organisation, (Nigeria), International Republican Institute (South Africa), and Patriotic Women Foundation, (Abuja) as well as other bodies from the European Unions among others.

Addressing newsmen in Ado-Ekiti, state capital, on Tuesday, the observers praised the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for proper conduct of the poll in line with global and constitutional dictates and standards, however faulted the deployment of 30,000 policemen for the poll, claiming that such development and conduct of some of the security operatives largely marred the electoral process.

They insisted that such unwholesome practices of voting buying tagged ‘see and buy’ in local parlance, where voters surreptitiously showed which party they voted to party agents who went behind to ‘settle’ them, ballot box snatching, sporadic shootings and driving away of some party agents as well as intimidation, oppression and forceful influence of electorates’ free will, featured among anomalies that characterized the poll.

The observers therefore held that the July 14 poll cannot be recommended as a template for the forthcoming 2019 general elections as it falls short of global standards and spells doom for the nation if the lapses noticed were not addressed and a reorientation exercise across board put in place.

Addressing newsmen on behalf of the domestic observers, Dr. Gabriel Nwambu, of the Centre for Credible Leadership and Citizens Awareness, Abuja, said: ” Modern democracy guarantees freedom of electorate to determine who to vote, anything against this is an usurp. Polls also should comply with globally accepted standards hence observers’ job is to access the level of compliance of electoral umpire to constitutional regulations which serve as a way to give direction for future exercise.


“Reports of observers remain a potential tool for election tribunals and other monitoring and relevant bodies for post election activities. 51 reputable domestic observer groups were on ground in all the 177 wards, 16 Local Government Areas and all the polling units in the state to monitor the poll. Ekiti has a record of being a serial politically volatile state in Nigeria and this became manifest before during and after the poll.

“On July 14, domestic observers witnessed large turnout of the electorate from 6:30 am, earlier than the stipulated time of 8:am. The exercise witnessed a high level of unprecedented electoral related challenges and such abuse will remain contentious until justice prevails, especially in the areas of cash inducement, arrests of political stalwarts by security agents and snatching of electoral materials by political thugs among other abuses.”

The observer cited some units and wards in Aramoko, Ekiti West Local Government Area, and Efon Alaaye, Erungbua settlement, Efon Local Government Area in which there were large numbers of accredited voters, saying that while many electorate, including pregnant women, persons living with disabilities and aged people trooped out to vote, card readers were slow, as voting buying and cash inducement held sway.

They said, “Finger biometric capture was slow. Party stewards were indicating to voters where to thumb print. Poll was delayed due to slow pace of machines.

“Party agents had huge cash and were close to voting points. Security agents were indifferent to cash inducement of voters. The whole process falls short of the compliance with international best standards.”

Speaking in the same vein, one of the International observers, Mrs. Virginia Marumoa-Gae, of the International Republican Institute (IRIS), South Africa, noted that accreditation and voting began simultaneously as early as 6 am on Saturday, July 14, with large numbers of electorate who arrived earlier than the scheduled 8am. She however noted that trouble began at 11am when “see and buy” started and this caused chaos across all the wards and polling units.

Citing several anomalies that featured in the poll, she said: “Voters showed their ballot papers to party agents to collect money, thugs disrupted voting process by shooting, but the police and other attaching security agents did well by establishing their presence at the polling units as stipulated by the constitution. We also noted that the INEC has improved on card readers this time.”er.

Also speaking, Mrs. Yemisi Ige of the Patriotic Women Foundation, a human rights organisation based in Abuja, noted that while INEC did its best within the framework of electoral regulations, conspicuous lapses in security caused many of the anomalies that greeted the poll.

She said: “The July 14 was full of human rights violations, political party agents arrest, disruption of polls leading to cancellation of polls results, adding that the deployment of 30, 000 policemen was unwarranted as it scared some voters away and is a clear case of violation of humans rights which disenfranchised voters as those who voted were either induced or forced to vote a certain party and made the poll to fall short of global standards.”

Concluding his report, Nwambu said: “The poll fell short of the threshold of international standards as it was based on vote buying, it will be a disaster to recommend the poll for 2019, but INEC did a good job by conducting the poll in line with best global standards, but they are not the security the challenge what gave rise to the shortcomings is due to security lapses. There should be a reorientation as this development spells doom for Nigeria ahead of 2019.”

( Hide )
  1. Can you tell me anything that's up to global standard in Nigeria, from health, education, electricity, road network, etc. Why would these people think that election would be any different? Whilst we should not continue to applaud our inefficiency as a nation, we are on a journey and someday we will get there in every facet of our lives not election alone.

    ReplyDelete

Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)

Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com

© Copyright © 2023 NigerianEye.com | Your Online Nigerian Newspaper | All Rights Reserved