DHQ right to declare IPOB a terrorist organisation in the first place - Sagay | Nigeria News Today. Your online Nigerian Newspaper

8


Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) Chairman Prof Itse Sagay (SAN) yesterday backed the military’s declaration of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) as a terrorist organisation.



He said he agreed with the Defence Headquarters’ description of IPOB as a terror group even if he was not sure whether the army complied with legal requirements in making the pronouncement.

Sagay, in a recent interview said IPOB exhibited characteristics that justified being so described.

According to him, even if the group wanted secession, there were better ways of doing it than using abusive language and stoking violence, which he accused IPOB leader Nnamdi Kanu of.

He said: “Whilst I’m not sure of the legal parameters of that declaration, in practice, I agree. If you look at it, we’re very lucky that this thing did not get out of hand.

“They (IPOB) were coming in their thousands, establishing road blocks, bringing out Northerners – for what, I don’t know – to kill some of them? If that is allowed, then the country is finished. Then they burned down a police station, killed a policeman.

“For Christ’s sake, even if you want Biafra, you don’t have to be violent. If you look at the words that Kanu uses on the social media, how he has described our President and the rest of us as living in a zoo – abusive, violent, intemperate words – kill, kill, kill, all those in my view, constitute in totality acts of terrorism in which they can push undiscerning youths into rage and violence, which can be destructive.

“You saw Moslems seeking protection in Port Harcourt. If you start killing Northerners and the North reacts, then we’ve had it.

“I just thank God that the North is showing some maturity and some sense of restraint while this is being curbed. But we really need to curb IPOB, otherwise they will turn this country into a tinderbox.”

Sagay said he would not stop expressing his views on issues of national importance despite the Senate asking President Buhari to call him to order.

When reminded that the All Progressives Congress (APC) also once cautioned him about his criticisms of the National Assembly, the law professor described the party’s leadership as “a failure”.

He said: “As for the leadership of the APC, I think they are the most unprincipled group of people. They are lily-livered, weak, and cannot run any organisation. The whole party is collapsing under them. They cannot control anybody.

“In fact, they’re now encouraging and accepting ‘rogue elephants’, pampering people who are destroying the party, saying ‘let’s not annoy them too much’, but they’re destroying the APC house.

“So, I think the APC leadership is weak, is too compromising and is certainly a failure as far as I’m concerned.”

Sagay said the war against corruption could not be won without committed judges.

He accused some judges of “deliberately” sabotaging the crusade by obstructing justice.

His words: “We are very concerned about the judiciary. Without the judiciary, we can kiss the anti-corruption war goodbye. We must have a committed judiciary, otherwise they will keep messing up any case that comes. It’s so easy to give a reason, which will appear to be reasonable, and the public will say the anti-corruption agencies have not done their homework. It’s not so.

“Quite a number of the judges are deliberately taking decisions which I’d say indicate their hostility to the anti-corruption war. There are judges who are hostile. There are judges who interfere when such cases are going on, using their position to ensure that government loses.

“Government is aware of all this. It’s just that some of us are not in a position to take decisions. People who should be stopped are slipping through and still being relevant when in fact they should be pushed aside into retirement where they will not interfere in the anti-corruption struggle.

“There are reports on these judges, some by the Department of State Services (DSS). I feel that judges who are not committed to the eradication of corruption should be eased out of the system.”

Sagay said he stood by his assertion that the Senate was self-centered and unsupportive of the anti-graft war.

“One of the most critical Bills pending before them – the Special Crimes Court Bill – was yet to be passed,” he said.

The PACAC chairman said it was rather the Senate that owed him an apology for abusing him for speaking the truth.

“I didn’t abuse them. I merely said they’re not committed to the Nigerian people, that they’re there for themselves alone. I provided the figures to show it. I know the worse exists.

“There are certain things I didn’t say. I did not even mention what the Majority Leader, Deputy Senate President and Senate President get as extras. Those extras run into hundreds of millions of naira. What I said at that lecture is a tip of the iceberg.

“Our aim is for the National Assembly to finally admit that they’re frittering away our national assets and preventing these funds from being used for various other vital sectors to create more employment and fix infrastructure.

“If you recall, former Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor Lamido Sanusi said they were consuming 25 per cent of our budget. They didn’t deny it. Instead, former President Jonathan forced Sanusi out.

“If we look at the senators’ allowances, we should ask ourselves questions. Should we be the ones clothing senators? Should my tax be used in hanging agbada on a senator?

“How many times has government provided clothes for workers? But these men who are overpaid are still asking us to clothe them as if they arrived in Abuja naked.

”These same people ask us to pay them hardship allowance for doing their job. What of the man who is earning N18,000 a month, who operates machinery and sweeps the streets? No one pays them hardship allowance!”

“Yet, people who live in tremendous luxury get paid hardship allowance running into billions. Why are Nigerians quiet about it? I don’t understand it,” Sagay said.

On the Senate’s refusal to confirm Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Acting Chairman Ibrahim Magu, Sagay said it was the President’s exclusive prerogative to decide how long he remains in office.

“Magu can act indefinitely. The Senate does not have jurisdiction in this matter. It is the President who does because of Section 171 of the Constitution. This government is being a bit gentle, not wanting to ruffle feathers. Maybe that’s why they’re politicians and in government.

“If people like me who are not politicians were there, these people (senators) would have heard a different message. I’d have rammed things through and damned them to go and do whatever they like, and let’s see who would come on top.

“I believe that ultimately, righteousness, a good cause, a belief in principle will prevail. We’re dealing with people who are undergoing all sorts of investigations; they cannot face the righteous.”

FacebookTwitterGoogle+PinterestLinkedInWhatsApp

Post a Comment Default Disqus

  1. You're dead wrong. How do you declare unarmed group of people terrorists? That's a misnomer

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nothing wrong in what you said, a round of applause to the vibrant prof

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you are always foolish in all your comments

      Delete
  3. The army's job is not the classification of terrorists. The Classification of terrorists is the purview of homeland security, thus the jurisdiction of the DSS subsequent to the application of due process through the security council. This just goes to show massive incompetence on either or both sides.
    We are not running a MILITARY DICTATORSHIP anymore, MILITARY stop making pronouncements with impunity. Haba!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Prof Itse Sagay,i respect you but in my opinion on this case you are wrong. My simple question to you is that,if the military was not sent to the south east,all this issue of violence by the so called IPOB would not has happened,Police station wouldn't have been burnt,youth wouldn't throw-ed stones to military artillery. The fact still remains that there was tension already in the south east and soldiers where deploy there to cause more tension which lead to breaking of law by the IPOB members,did they even break any law. The Nigeria court will define that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My friend 'Anonymous' u claimed dat even before soldier got to d East there was tension. Why d tension? Was d soldier caused Kanu to operate Biafra radio, called d Yorubas and d Hausas unprintable names, calling Nigeria 'zoo', calling d Youth out for war and forming Biafra secret services? U see don't let us see all issues from our ethnic affiliation. Every body knows dat Kanu was poised for war against Nigeria and he is been edging on by d likes of Prof. Nwabueze and some religious leaders instead of cautioning him. I believe d Easterners could have done like d Yorubas: organise conference to articulate their position on d issue of restructuring instead of allowing Kanu to speak and insist on referendum which is outside our constitution. Calling for 'no election' in Anambra is absolute lawlessness and no govt will open d space for dat kind of nonentity like Kanu. So let d proscription stays and d Igbos can now sit down and plan for restructuring. If u secede today Ibos are d ones dat will lose their investment in other lands. How many Yorubas have investment in igboland? But look at Ibos in Lagos. Remember d issue of 'abandoned properties'. Yorubas were magnanimous to release Igbo properties in d west. Did Port Harcourt indigents extend such gestures? Think well before following ur Kanu sheepishly.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous 11.22 is completely right. Though he might have made a mistake by suggesting that there were tension in the East before the arrival of the army but the fact remains that there was never any violence by the IPOB before the military arrived the south East. The IPOB were only only organising peaceful rally within the south Eastern states and some states in the south south.

      Delete
  5. IPOB was beginning to constitute themselves into an intolerable nuisance. There can't two heads of state within a state! Kanu was very very rude to the elders within the region and stupidity referred to them as Ohaneze ndi ara. A child who abuses his own elders must be ready to bear the brunt of his stupidity. Why is he on the run now? He should have waited and confronted the military! Only a mad man would challenge an armed person with a machete or bare hands!

    ReplyDelete

Nigeria News Comments are Moderated. Clean Comments will be swiftly approved. No swear words, no racism, allowed.

 
xzb
Top